Pelanggaran Privasi Dalam Program Realita Investigasi Polisi di Indonesia: Ancaman, Kebijakan, Dan Kebutuhan Pembaruan
Privacy Breach in Police Investigation Reality Program in Indonesia: Threats, Policy, and The Need For Reform
Abstract
The high popularity of police investigation reality programs in content broadcast on television and online media (YouTube) increases the possibility of doxing. Several laws, especially Law no. 19 of 2016, have provisions regarding the protection of personal life. However, until now, there has been no regulation that clearly regulates the authority for the participation of television stations in the process of finding investigative facts. This paper aims to find a legal basis for privacy violations against police investigation reality program coverage and to formulate a more comprehensive privacy protection instrument. This research is a normative research with a statutory approach. The research shows that there is a debate between public interest and privacy protection in the coverage of police investigative reality programs, as well as violations of laws and ethical codes committed by the Republic of Indonesia police and private television stations. The presence of the concept of protecting privacy for the public, especially suspects, is expected to be the main value base considered in every coverage of the police investigative reality program.
Tingginya popularitas program realita investigasi polisi dalam konten penayangan di media penyiaran televisi dan media online (YouTube) meningkatkan kemungkinan doxing. Beberapa Undang-Undang terutama Undang-Undang No. 19 Tahun 2016 memiliki ketentuan mengenai perlindungan kehidupan pribadi, walaupun demikian sampai saat ini belum ada regulasi yang dengan jelas mengatur mengenai otoritas keikutsertaan stasiun televisi dalam proses pencarian fakta investigasi. Tulisan ini bertujuan mencari dasar hukum pelanggaran privasi terhadap peliputan program realita investigasi polisi dan merumuskan instrumen perlindungan privasi yang lebih komperhensif. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Penelitian menunjukkan adanya perdebatan antara kepentingan publik dan perlindungan privasi dalam peliputan program realita investigasi polisi serta adanya pelanggaran hukum serta kode etik yang dilakukan oleh kepolisian Republik Indonesia dan stasiun televisi swasta. Hadirnya konsep perlindungan privasi bagi masyarakat khusunya tersangka diharapkan menjadi basis nilai utama yang diperhatikan dalam setiap peliputan program realita investigasi kepolisian.
Downloads
References
‘86 & Custom Protection NET.’ (2021, October). ‘86 & Custom Protection NET’ (YouTube, 2015) <https://www.youtube.com/c/86CustomProtectionNET/about> accessed 28 October 202. Lihat juga, ‘The Police’ (TRANS 7) <https://www.trans7.co.id/programs/the-police> accessed 28 October 2021.
Aas, G. (2021). Fieldwork in police studies–the ethical dilemma in participatory observation with police patrols. Police Practice and Research, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2020.1724788
Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. . (n.d.).
Akil, M. A. (2014). Regulasi Media Di Indonesia (Tinjauan UU Pers dan UU Penyiaran). Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh, 15(2).
Arden, D. M. (2017). Privacy And Third Parties To Criminal Proceedings. Cambridge Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197317000691
Azwar, A.-. (2017). INDUSTRI TELEVISI DAN WAJAH BURAM POLITIK INDONESIA. Jurnal Komunika : Jurnal Komunikasi, Media Dan Informatika, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.31504/komunika.v6i2.1109
Biro Humas Hukum dan Kerjasama. (n.d.). ‘Regulasi Untuk Media Sosial, Perlukah? ’ (Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, 6 February 2021) <https://www.kemenkumham.go.id/berita/regulasi-untuk-media-sosial-perlukah> accessed 28 October 2021 .
Boling, K. S. (2019). True crime podcasting: Journalism, justice or entertainment? Radio Journal:International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1386/rjao_00003_1
Budhijanto D. (2010). Hukum Telekomunikasi, Penyiaran Dan Teknologi Informasi: Regulasi Dan Konvergensi . PT Refika Aditama .
Cassilo, D. (2021). Privacy violations and mobile streaming video: examining organizational social media policies and Antonio Brown’s Facebook live stream. Sport in Society, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2019.1634692
Chen, M., Cheung, A. S. Y., & Chan, K. L. (2019). Doxing: What adolescents look for and their intentions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16020218
Choe, J. Y., Son, D., & Kim, S. (2017). The Limitations on the Use of Big Data Pursuant to Data Privacy Regulations in Korea*. Journal of Korean Law | (Vol. 17).
Çɪnar, Ö. H. (2021). The current case law of the European Court of Human Rights on privacy: challenges in the digital age. International Journal of Human Rights, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1747443
Crow, M. S., Snyder, J. A., Crichlow, V. J., & Smykla, J. O. (2017). Community Perceptions of Police Body-Worn Cameras: The Impact of Views on Fairness, Fear, Performance, and Privacy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816688037
Dahlberg, M., & Wyatt, D. (2019). Is there a public interest in knowing what is going on in society? A comparative study of the European Courts. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 26(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X19865839
Darko, S. A. (2020). Investigative journalism in ghana: balancing public interest and individual privacy. Cogent Social Sciences, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1772444
Daryanto, A. (2018). Pengaruh Tayangan Program Berita 86 Di NET TV Terhadap Tingkat Kecemasan Orang Tua (Survei Warga Rw 07 Kel. Tugu Kec. Cimanggis Kota Depok).
Douglas, D. M. (2016). Doxing: a conceptual analysis. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9406-0
duniatv. (2021, October). ‘Rating Program The Police TRANS7 Curi Perhatian’ (Dunia Televisi Indonesia, 7 August 2021) .
Epstein D and Quinn K. (2020). Corrigendum to Markers of Online Privacy Marginalization: Empirical Examination of Socioeconomic Disparities in Social Media Privacy Attitudes, Literacy, and Behavior (Social Media + Society, (2020). Social Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120946652
Garcia-Blanco, I., & Bennett, L. (2021). Between a ‘media circus’ and ‘seeing justice being done’: Metajournalistic discourse and the transparency of justice in the debate on filming trials in British newspapers. Journalism, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918760025
Hasanah S. (2021). ‘Kriteria Siaran Televisi Di Indonesia ’ (Hukumonline, 2016) <https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt57ecb4b67edeb/kriteria-siaran-televisi-di-indonesia>. Hukumonline.
Jang, C., & Sung, W. J. (2021). Beyond the privacy paradox: The moderating effect of online privacy concerns on online service use behavior. Telematics and Informatics, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101715
John, N. A., & Peters, B. (2017). Why privacy keeps dying: the trouble with talk about the end of privacy. Information Communication and Society, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1167229
Jonathan Peters. (2015). ‘Can I Do That? A Legal Primer for Journalists’ . Columbia Journalism Review, 29 October 2015.
Kemp S. (n.d.). ‘DIGITAL 2021: INDONESIA’ (2021) <https://andi.link/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Hootsuite-We-are-Social-Indonesian-Digital-Report-2021_compressed.pdf>.
Klos, M. (2018). Responsibility to publish : balancing privacy and freedom of expression. In Amsterdam Privacy Conference.
Kusnadi, S. A. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Data Pribadi Sebagai Hak Privasi. AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.47776/alwasath.v2i1.127
Lincoln, R., & McGillivray, L. (2019). Citizen surveil-labour: Analysing Crime Stoppers and its alliance of police, media, and publics. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 52(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865818786761
MacPherson J. (n.d.). ‘ON WHAT AUTHORITY? IN SEARCH OF A LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR GOVERNMENT FACILITATION OF “MEDIA RIDE-ALONG” PROGRAMMES AND THE PRIVACY HARM THEY CAUSE.’ (2021) 52 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 113 <http://10.0.104.62/vuwlr.v52i1.6847> .
Maharani T. (n.d.). ‘Saat Melaksanakan Tugas, Polisi Diminta Lindungi Hak Privasi Warga’ (Kompas.com, 19 October 2021) <https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/10/19/08544041/saat-melaksanakan-tugas-polisi-diminta-lindungi-hak-privasi-warga>.
Mattie, M. R. (2018). The implications of major news outlets broadcasting law enforcement-citizen encounters: are they reliable? JOURNAL OF HIGH TECHNOLOGY LAW, 29(1).
Megaputri D. (2021, October). ‘Mengapa Bripka Ambarita Dimutasi Ke Polda Metro Jaya? Ternyata Begini Kronologinya!’ .
Morrison, D. E., & Svennevig, M. (2007). The defence of public interest and the intrusion of privacy: Journalists and the public. Journalism, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884907072420
Natamiharja, R. (2019). Perlindungan Data Privasi dalam Konstitusi Negara Anggota ASEAN. Hak Konstitusional.
Noval SMR. (2021a). Cyberbullying Hak-Hak Digital: Right On Online Safety .
Noval SMR. (2021b). ‘Doxing Phenomenon in Indonesia: Amid Waiting for Privacy Settings’ (2021) 4 Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences 3636 <http://bircu-journal.com/index.php/birci/article/view/2132> accessed 4 October 2021 .
Panuju R. (2015). Sistem Penyiaran Indonesia . (1st edn, Prenamedia Group 2015) .
Pasal 10 Konvensi Eropa tentang Hak Asasi Manusia .
PŪRAITĖ A and ŠILINSKĖ N. (n.d.). ‘STATE REGULATION OF PRIVACY AND ITS PROTECTION IN THE USE OF VIRDS BY POLICE: COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE FROM LATVIA AND LITHUANIA.’ [2021]. Public Security & Public Order / Visuomenes Saugumas Ir Viesoji Tvarka 115.
Ramdhani, A., Muhammad, ;, & Ramdhani, A. (n.d.). Konsep Umum Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Publik.
Rowbottom J. (n.d.). Rowbottom J, ‘Reporting Police Investigations, Privacy Rights and Social Stigma: Richard v BBC’ (2018) 10 Journal of Media Law 115.
Saeed Abbasi I and Al-Sharqi L. (2021). ‘Media Censorship: Freedom versus Responsibility’ (2015) 7 Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution 21 <http://www.academicjournals.org/JLCR> accessed 28 October 2021 . 7 Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution 21 .
Safitri E. (2021, October). ‘2 Anggota Komisi III Juga Kritik Video Penangkapan Coki Pardede’ (detiknews, 9 September 2021) <https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5716615/2-anggota-komisi-iii-juga-kritik-video-penangkapan-coki-pardede>.
Skinner-Thompson S. (2020). ‘No Privacy in Public = No Privacy for the Precarious’, Privacy at the Margins . (Cambridge University Press 2020).
sobur, A. (n.d.). Pers, Hak Privasi, Hak Publik. Media Neliti.
Suhariyanto B. (2013). Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi (Cybercrime): Urgensi Pengaturan Dan Celah Hukumnya . (2nd edn, PT Rajagrafindo Persada 2013).
THE POLICE’ (YouTube). (n.d.). ‘86 & Custom Protection NET’ (YouTube) , ‘THE POLICE’ (YouTube).
Triadanti. (n.d.). ‘17 Meme Adegan Program 86 NET TV Bikin Ngakak Gak Karuan’ (IDN TIMES, 20 May 2018) <https://www.idntimes.com/hype/humor/danti/17-meme-adegan-program-86-net-tv-bikin-ngakak-gak-karuan-1/2> .
Uduma, N. E., Nwasum, C. J., Abaneme, E. C., & Icha-Ituma, E. (2021). We are watching them as they post: a mirror into the Nigerian Police Force use of social media and challenges affecting its adoption in policing. Police Practice and Research, 22(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2020.1848563
UNICEF. (n.d.). ‘Guidelines for Journalists Reporting on Children.’
Wang, X., & Baker, D. J. (2022). Criminalising privacy in the digital age: The reasonable expectation of not being digitally monitored. Journal of Criminal Law, 86(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/00220183211033150
Yusuf Putra, A., Kau Suni Prodi Ilmu Komunikasi, E., & Ilmu Komunikasi, F. (n.d.). Prosiding Jurnalistik Pengaruh Tayangan 86 Net. terhadap Perilaku Ketertiban Berkendara.
Copyright (c) 2023 JCIC : Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Author(s) who wish to publish with this journal should agree to the following terms:
-
Author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal for noncommercial purposes.
-
Author(s) are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
The publisher publish and distribute the Article with the copyright notice to the JCIC: Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial with the article license CC-BY-NC 4.0.
.svg_1.png){kind=logo}
