Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or institutions.

 

Copyright Notice

The author whose published manuscript approved the following provisions:

1. The right of publication of all material published in the journal / published on the JCIC : Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial website is held by the journal with the knowledge of the author (moral right remains the author of the script). Letter of the copyright transform can be downloaded at the following link: Copyright Transfer Form.

2. The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license (CC BY-SA).

3. Printed and published print and electronic manuscripts are open access for any purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.

This work is licenced under a https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

 

Focus and ScopeFocus and Scope of:

sociology, law, politics, education, social development, government, democracy, religion and politics, urban studies, rural studies, gender, media studies, and other related themes.

 

Peer Review Process

The manuscripts submitted online to the JCIC : Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial will be peer-reviewed. The practice of peer review aims to ensure the quality of articles published in this journal. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out by all reputable scientific journals. The reviewers in our journal play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of the journal.

All manuscripts submitted to JCIC : Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosialare peer reviewed using the procedure outlined below.  

Initial manuscript evaluation
The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those manuscripts that meet the minimum criteria are normally passed on to at least two experts for review.

Type of peer review
JCIC : Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial employs a double-blind review where the authors of the manuscript will remain anonymous throughout the process. The manuscript is reviewed by the reviewers that are assigned based on their expertise.

 Reviewer reports
Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript: - Is original - Is methodologically sound - Follows appropriate ethical guidelines - Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions - Correctly references previous relevant work. Language correction is not part of the peer review process, but referees may, if so wish, suggest corrections to the manuscript.

 Editor’s decision
Final decision of manuscript (accepted, accepted with minor revision, accepted with major revision, rejected or re-submit) is made by Editor in Chief (together with Editorial Board if required for consideration) based on the reviewers’ critical comments. The editor’s decision is final.  

 Final report
A final report of the decision whether to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the reviewers that may include verbatim comments from the reviewers.   

 

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.